Bottom Line

Overall, The North Face ThermoBall Traction Mule V has the comfort of a slipper but the tough sole of an outdoor shoe. We reached for these more than any other of the camp shoes in our gear guide.  

The North Face lists these as insulated camp shoes – but the lowest on their three-tiered warmth scale. We had issues with their lack of warmth in temperatures below 40 degrees and were disappointed at how sweaty our feet got once temperatures creeped into the high 50s. It is important to understand that these are not as warm and insulated as the Feathered Friends Down Booties.

However, this insulated bootie kept us comfortable indoors, outdoors, and around camp. It also looks attractive in town. We found it was a great option to wear on the way to the trailhead or ski resort.

How We Tested

We tested this camp shoe in different environments and for different lengths of time to best understand how this shoe fits, performs, and wears throughout the day. Our first test was a night of camping on very rocky terrain, including setting up a tent, cooking food, running around with the dog, and kicking back in camp chairs as the night fell. In the morning, we took these for a walk around a paved and dirt loop –– about 5 miles in total of meandering. The second was a full day around the house from waking up to saying goodnight. During this day, we chased children around the yard, giving piggyback rides and tossing around a soccer ball, as well as walking, sitting, and standing around the house.

COMFORT

The North Face ThermoBall Traction Mule V rates highly for comfort thanks to its roomy fit, ease of wear, and little to no break-in. We recommend sizing up – We wore a full size up from our normal shoe size and found this to be a good fit.

At first wear, we found the Mule to be roomy with great fit. We wore this shoe with Darn Tough wool socks – one of our favorite hiking socks – in a few different settings as well as without socks. Each time, we could wiggle our toes and felt that the toe box was wide enough. Our toes never hit the front of the shoe when sitting, standing, or walking around. Throughout the tests, the heel kept our foot in place and allowed us to walk comfortably all day. 

We thought the shoe slipped on well. The heel is made to collapse, so you can slide it on and wear it as a mule when in a rush. When testing, we kept this by the side of our tent to slip on for midnight bathroom runs. They were easy to slip on in the dark.

VERSATILITY

When testing in the field, we loved that we could walk away from camp in the Traction Mule V to explore the surrounding areas. Its sole allows  for basic walks outside.  In Yosemite, we felt comfortable walking along icy and slick, leaf-filled pavement. These would make changing in the ski resort parking lot easier. 

The Mule’s weight and packability were appropriate for backpacking. The one-pound weight may be limiting for ultralighters, but these insulated slippers packed down better than several camp shoes and sandals.

However, we only found them palatable to wear in cool temperatures. 

At camp, when temps hit the lower 40s with frozen ground underfoot, our tester felt some cold seep in –– even with wool socks on. Her toes were popsicles when temps hit mid-to-low 30s. Our feet also felt sweaty and clammy indoors with the thermostat set at 69 degrees – even without socks on. 

SUPPORT

We tested The North Face Mule’s support by using the bend, twist, squeeze method. During this test, we got mixed results. 

We placed the toe of the shoe on the ground and pressed the heel down. The entire shoe crumpled beneath the pressure laid on it. This wasn’t ideal and, honestly, surprising because of the thick and cushioned sole of this shoe. Unsurprisingly, after the bend test, the shoe also did not hold up to the twist test. This shoe twirled around better than a wet towel.  

However, when we conducted the final support test –– squeezing the heel –– we were pleasantly met with resistance. The heel kept its shape and structure through this test. 

In the field, we took these on a meandering 5-mile, flat-ish walk. About 3 miles in, we noticed pain through the arches of our feet.

DURABILITY

Our pair of The North Face ThermoBalls held up as we walked through mud and gravel and tried to keep up with screaming 6-year-olds. These outdoor slippers are made with a ripstop material with a good reputation for durability. Our only complaint is that the fabric on the upper stains easily. 

The North Face recommends cleaning off mud and dirt to prevent premature decay of the fabric. They do not recommend throwing them in the wash. Instead, spot wash and air dry.

Should You Buy The North Face ThermoBall Traction Mule?

The North Face ThermoBall Traction Mule V makes a great slipper-like shoe for car campers and outdoor adventurers who pack a trailhead change of clothes/shoes. We would not recommend this for backpacking trips or for those who need a reliable way to keep warm at camp in temperatures colder than the low 40s. They might be a good option for summers in places that cool off considerably at night or for those who have poor circulation.

What Other Camp Shoes Should You Consider?

If these insulated slippers aren’t for you, browse our full list of camp shoe recommendations. 

Feathered Friends Down Bootie Review: If you are looking for a reliable shoe to keep you warm when temps drop below 45 degrees, the Feathered Friends is a good choice. 

Bedrock Mountain Clog Review: Though this shoe is not necessarily made for winter, when paired with a wool sock, it can take on cooler temps.

KEEN Hyperport H2 Review: This shoe makes up for what The North Face Mule lacks – the ability to travel comfortably through water.

Bottom Line

The Merrell Hydro Moc is like the Crocs Classic Clog but with better support. That’s why we’ve added it to our latest list of the best camp shoes.

This is a lightweight, aerated, and flexible water shoe made from a waterproof EVA foam. We love how the insole meets the arch of our foot and how it feels like our foot can sink into the shoe. They feel more supportive than the Crocs but less than the KEEN Hyperport H2 Sandal. Regardless, the shoe felt secure, especially with how the articulated heel fit around our ankle . . . until we started walking around. 

This shoe loses points with us for its lackluster fit. One of the first things we noticed was the heel coming up and down as we walked. After about a mile or so, we began to feel the beginnings of a heel blister. The second thing we noticed was our toes scrunching up and hitting the top of the shoe. We were put off by the rubbing and fit issues of the shoe.

These were more comfortable when wearing socks. If this water shoe fits you, it could be a camp shoe for wet and dry conditions.

How We Tested

We tested this water shoe on a travel day which included casual strolling, carrying heavy suitcases, and standing for long stretches. We also tested this by taking it on a flat, two-mile walk on mixed surfaces including pavement, dirt, grass, gravel, and water. Finally, we conducted tests in the office for support and durability.

COMFORT

We thought that the Merrell Hydro Moc would rate higher for comfort, but we found fit issues we could not overlook. Our big toe was squished to the top of the shoe. We would recommend going up a half size, but user reviews complain about the arch being in the wrong spot after sizing up. When we were testing, the arch support hit our foot correctly, so we would be hesitant to size up. 

Another issue was rubbing at the ankle. These Mocs are not made to be worn with socks, but even with socks on, we felt rubbing as we packed the car up for camp. We also felt the heel moving up and down during our testing. 

Other than that, the fit is really comfortable. The shoe has a wide toe box that allows toes to spread out and wiggle. It fits well around the back. 

We were also shocked at how easy this shoe is to slip on. They may look tight and hard to slide into, but the foam material is flexible. They don’t slip on like the OOfos OOriginal, but it just takes a couple of fingers to slip into the heel strap.

VERSATILITY

This water shoe tries to go above its intended use to adapt to rough terrain and added miles. However, we weren’t too impressed with its performance on land. The heel straps secured the mocs to our feet, but we felt the need to wear socks for comfort if we did any real walking. While testing, we walked through wet grass and then over a packed dirt trail. This covered the shoes in dirt, and we could feel the dirt between our toes. The bottom didn’t provide great traction, either –– its traction was not as good as the Aquagrip on the KEEN Hyperport H2 Sandal. 

These shoes are pretty light at 12.3 ounces – though not as light as the Crocs Classic Clogs. They were light enough to pack for backpacking. Overall, though, we preferred them as water shoes over other uses.

SUPPORT

When we first slipped the Hydro Moc on, its sole seemed to hug our feet and lift up our tired arches. 

We also conducted the bend, twist, squeeze test on these shoes to test the support. By placing the toe on the ground and pressing down on the heel, we tested stability by seeing where the moc bent. The Merrell passed this test – the toe box folded but the sole remained solid. 

Next, we twisted it –– taking the heel in one hand and the toe in the other then pushing in opposite directions –– we can see how stable and supportive it was. The Hydro Moc resisted twisting, showing that it is quite supportive. 

Finally, by taking the heel in the hand and squeezing, we can test the support in the back of the shoe. Again, the shoe should resist movement. This shoe passed this test as well. 

DURABILITY

The Hydro Moc is a durable shoe. From its materials to our testing, we found almost no complaints of how these shoes hold up over time. 

The Hydro Moc’s uppers are made from EVA foam, which is a copolymer that takes on the characteristics of plastic and rubber. It’s a material that offers amazing flexibility and still snaps back into place. The remainder of the shoe is made from BLOOM performance foam, which is a proprietary foam made in part from algae. This material mimics plastic, including its durability. 

We found no issues with durability after our outdoor testing of this shoe. Although some customer reviews complained of quality, pointing out that not only are these changed from older models but that the soles didn’t hold up over time.

Should You Buy the Merrell Hydro Moc?

The Merrell Hydro Moc may be a good option for someone who is looking for a more stable version of a Crocs Classic Clogs. The heel support keeps the foot in place even when walking quickly or jumping around. 

These shoes probably wouldn’t be a good match for someone who wears half-sizes in shoes. These shoes only come in full sizes but there are some issues with fit. Sizing up too much might cause fit issues for the arch support, but sizing down might mean your toes might be scrunched up.

What Other Camp Shoes Should You Consider?

If the Merrell Hydro Moc isn’t what you’re looking for, please browse our full list of the best camp shoes. 

Crocs Classic Clog Review: The Merrell shares similar design elements with this shoe, but this one is a bit easier to slip on, don’t blister that we’ve found, and have fewer customer complains of quality issues. 

KEEN Hyperport H2 Sandal Review: This supportive and cushioned water sandal is the one we recommend for water adventures that require multiple miles of walking or full day excursions. 

HOKA ORA Recovery 3 Slide Review: Though these aren’t necessarily water shoes (they dry quickly though), they offer support, pretty good traction, and an easy and comfortable fit.

Bottom Line

KEEN is a beloved brand, so we had high expectations for the Whisper Sandal – which ranked in the middle of the pack of the camp shoes we recommend. After field-testing it, we’d happily wear the KEEN Whisper for water-based activities and may even consider it for longer hiking or backpacking trips. However, our gear analyst had issues with rubbing and hot spots. 

We loved the smart features like the cinch at the top, which helps adjust the size and fit – even the webbing at the heel. We are also endeared to the eco-conscious mission of the company, which prioritizes materials and processes that won’t harm the environment. All-in-all, we believe this to be a quality sandal that can tackle almost anything.

How We Tested

We tested this shoe in the field by taking it on a 1.5-mile walk on grass, gravel, pavement, and water and a 4.3-mile walk along pavement, mud, gravel, and a dry riverbed. At the office, we tested this shoe for its support and analyzed the materials to assess durability.

COMFORT

When we initially put them on, the KEEN Whisper sandals fit through the soles and toes, but our heels felt close to the edge of the shoes. Over the course of our walking tests and adjusting the cinched closure, the shoe felt more comfortable, and we soon forgot about the heel. 

The cinch is a nice detail to adjust the sandal’s fit. These sandals are easier to put on than a trail runner or lace-up shoe but not as quick as some of our other favorite camp shoes. 

We did have some pause on our longer, 4-plus-mile walk. The material at the ankle opening hugs right up on the bottom of the ankle bone. We noticed the material at the ankle opening hugging our ankle bone, which led to rubbing and pinkish skin but no broken skin or blisters. Another issue was a hot spot that formed under our toes on a fast walk, which left our toes feeling sensitive for the rest of the day.

VERSATILITY

KEEN bills the Whisper sandal as a multi-talented water shoe, ready to tackle great outdoor adventures. We found the traction appropriate for both land and water. However, the sandal’s drying time limited its versatility. It features synthetic webbed uppers which took more time to dry than the OOfos OOriginals. During hot days, this probably doesn’t matter, but on a 65-degree day, our feet felt wet for more than 20 minutes after walking through water. 

Their weight also limits their appropriateness for backpacking. The Whispers weigh 9.9 oz per sandal – heavier than the KEEN Hyperport H2 Sandal and the second-heaviest option in our camp shoes guide. We still might take these on backpacking trips that require frequent water crossings, but their weight might deter some backpackers.

SUPPORT

We conducted support tests at home using the bend, twist, squeeze method. During the bend test, the toe box compressed completely but the midsole stayed firm and tough through the pressure. The soles also resisted twisting, and the heel didn’t budge when squeezed. Overall, these tests concluded that this shoe offers good support and stability – but not as much as the KEEN Hyperport H2 sandal. 

We tested this shoe in the field after a big workout that left our joints and our bodies sore. Walking in the Whispers, we immediately felt our bad knees and ankles. By the end of a 4.3-mile walk on flat ground, our knee felt swollen. The sole is not completely flat, but it didn’t support our arch as much as we wanted. The Whisper wasn’t as restorative as the recovery slides we tested and reviewed – the HOKA Ora and OOfos OOriginals. 

DURABILITY

We found no faults in the durability of these shoes. As we examined the materials, we found the polyester webbing and stitching seemed solid, even after nearly 6 miles of hard trail use. However, user reviews site issues with the heel straps coming loose or ripping after only a couple of wears. 

KEEN offers a 1 year warranty on their shoes if they’re purchased from an authorized dealer and the complaints are not of normal wear and tear, accident, neglect, or improper use. We don’t love that KEEN’s warranty excludes the bungee lacing system and insoles. 

Should You Buy the KEEN Whisper Sandal?

The KEEN Whisper is made for more intense activities than some of our other favorite camp shoes. Its comfort, support, and traction make it easy to walk good distances – though be prepared for some rubbing – and its design makes water crossings and days at the beach a breeze. These are not the easy-going, slip-on shoes you’re looking for to run to the bathroom at 2am from your tent. It works best in summer, so those looking for a three-season shoe should look elsewhere. These sandals are a great value, however, for someone who is looking for a camp shoe that’s capable of more than simply walking and working around the campsite.

What Other Camp Shoes Should You Consider?

Continue your camp shoe research below or browse our full guide to the best camp shoes. 

KEEN Hyperport H2 Sandal Review: The cousin of the KEEN Whisper. This model we found to be more cushy, supportive, and comfortable. 

Bedrock Mountain Clog Review: This clog is another do-it-all shoe that we believe works better for three-season use. The only drawback is that this doesn’t travel through water like the KEEN. 

Merrell Hydro Moc Review: If the Crocs Classic Clogs and KEEN Whisper had a baby, the Hydro Moc would be it. It has the light, rubbery upper of the Croc but the support and foot security of the KEEN.

Bottom Line

The KEEN Hyperport H2 is one of the highest rated in our Camp Shoes guide because it is very supportive, well cushioned, versatile, and comfortable. We had some issues with rubbing on the side when testing and acknowledge that it’s not the easiest to slide on at midnight to make a bathroom run. However, overall, this sandal exceeded our expectations. 

The Hyperport is billed as a water shoe – one that you might wear to take the kayak out. It works well at water crossings, especially when there are particularly rocky sections to navigate. The sole has a unique pattern that enhances traction without adding bulky spaces for pebbles to get stuck in. The cushy support and snug fit at the heel melted our feet into absolute comfort while wearing. 

After a couple of miles, however, we did experience some rubbing from the straps. When we took the shoes off, we had red marks on our feet. This is not a common complaint from user reviewers, however, so this may be a personal fit issue.

How We Tested

We tested this shoe in a few different scenarios. The first was a 2-mile walk around the park, in which we experienced both flooded paved and dirt trails, sandy volleyball courts, gravel pathways, and rocks. Our second test was walking through a shallow stream up to our ankles. This review also takes into consideration tests conducted back at the office, including tests for support and durability.

COMFORT

The Hyperport H2 rated lower than expected for comfort. The fit was excellent and the shoe was relatively easy to throw on, but after a field test, we noticed significant rubbing. 

As soon as we put these on, the heel snapped to our foot. The fabric along the back cradled the heel in a way that felt secure and comfortable. While snug, it was still flexible. We wore our normal size in this shoe and felt happy with that decision. Unlike the KEEN Whisper, this sandal didn’t feel too short or like our heel was stepping on the outer edge of the footbed. 

As we started our walking test, we immediately noticed how amazing the shock-absorbing foam insole with arch support felt and how it made each step so comfortable. We thought that this would be comfortable enough to hike a full trail. However, the shoe rubbed and made these very uncomfortable. 

Our heels slid up during the test, regardless of how tight we cinched the top. This caused rubbing at the arch of the foot. After 1.5 miles without socks, we had blisters starting to form. Even before the blister stage, the rubbing distracted us  from the absolute heavenly feel of the soles. We also noticed that we started curling our feet to keep the shoes in place when walking over heavy, damp sand. 

The rubbing on the arch was so uncomfortable that we couldn’t wait to get these off. This was such a disappointment because the shoe’s insole is so comfortable. 

VERSATILITY

KEEN bills the Hyperport H2 Sandal as a hybrid adventure shoe, meant to hike and travel through water comfortably. When going through water, we noticed it felt grippy and comfortable. KEEN says that the sole is made from something called “Aquagrip” –– a rubber with zonal siping, or horizontal, thin slits. This technique is used for snow or all-terrain tires, providing more flexibility and traction. That Aquagrip worked well in water and also made us comfortable when climbing up boulders. 

When we got out of the water and shook our shoes out, a significant amount of water came out. This is all good and fine, but our feet felt squishy when walking. The uppers were soaked through. Even though the company claims these are quick-drying sandals, it took more than two  hours for them to fully dry in 60-degree shade.

These sandals exceeded our expectations for hiking, however. We could see ourselves wearing the Hyperport sandals instead of our trail runners for hikes with frequent water crossings. The cushion is incredible, as well, preventing anything on the ground –– from pavement to golf-ball sized rocks –– to penetrate our consciousness. Weighing in at 9.2 oz per sandal, the Hyperport H2 sits in the mid-range of our favorite camp shoes. At this weight, we would think about adding it to a weekend pack for treks into the backcountry –– especially since we’re confident in its ability to keep up anywhere in the environment.  

SUPPORT

Support is where we fell in love with the KEEN Hyperport H2 sandals. We tested this metric in two ways: 

First, we went through in-office tests of bending and twisting the sole and squeezing the heel. The sole was stiff enough to resist bending when we applied pressure. When we twisted the sandal, it demonstrated a healthy flex that might be appropriate on uneven terrain. Our tests also concluded the heel was stable and supportive. 

Sometimes these office tests don’t match the field tests, but when we took this sandal out for its two-mile hike, we were overjoyed with this sandal’s support. They felt as supportive as our trail runners, which made us confident in their long-distance abilities. 

DURABILITY

We found no faults with this shoe’s durability nor did user reviewers. After spending a full day of wear, plus a two-mile hike and a good stream soaking, we found the constitution of the shoe immaculate. The uppers feature durable materials that won’t stretch, shrink, or pill. The soles are soft, but when we dug our fingernails into them, they didn’t puncture. 

We don’t love that KEEN’s warranty excludes the bungee lacing system, but they will provide support and information to help you replace the bungee lacing system yourself.

Should You Buy the KEEN Hyperport H2 Sandal?

The KEEN Hyperport H2 Sandal provides excellent value to those looking for a warm-weather option. In spite of some potential rubbing issues, it offered us excellent support, cushion, and traction. The materials feel durable and won praise from other users. These may not fit the bill for someone who wants a more open water shoe –– like the Crocs Classic Clogs –– or a warmer option to protect against chilly nights and four-season camping. However, this sandal can walk through rivers and seashores to the rough granite peaks of our favorite hikes, which makes them even more versatile at camp and on trail.

What Other Camp Shoes Should You Consider?

The KEEN Hyperport H2 Sandal is just one of our favorite camp shoes, including 

Crocs Classic Clog Review: This classic clog replaces the polyester webbing upper of the KEEN for a fully rubber shoe that dries quicker after water crossings or shoreside days. 

Bedrock Mountain Clog Review: These clogs aren’t necessarily made for water, but their incredible traction and cushion make them a great option for a camp shoe. 

The North Face ThermoBall Traction Mule V Review: This mule is also not made for water but it is made to keep you warmer during fall and spring camping.

Bottom Line

The HOKA Ora Recovery 3 Slide is amazing for what it claims to be: a recovery shoe. It wasn’t meant to be the ultra-lightweight option to carry into the backcountry or for grand, multi-mile adventures – though, we might consider doing this after testing and reviewing it as a camp shoe. 

This slide’s best qualities are its support and cushion, but it also has amazing traction. The support was enough to relax our tense muscles and massage our tired feet after long hikes and intense workouts. The cushion protected our feet in the gnarliest of high desert environments. And though these are slides, the soles did anything but on challenging slopes. 

We found great value in these recovery slides as we see them working well in three seasons and around town. They were the comfort we longed for at the end of the day. Even though their fit might not work for everyone, we think the HOKA Ora slides generally are a great option for anyone.

How We Tested

We tested this shoe in several different ways. The first was a 2.5 mile walk along a flat, paved path to see how this would perform for walks around the campground and small adventures. We also tested the recovery claims of this shoe by wearing it after various double shifts at restaurants and after workouts. Finally, we tested the support by putting this shoe through the bend, twist, squeeze method.

COMFORT

The HOKA ORA Recovery 3 Slide was a mixed bag for comfort. We found the shoe easy to wear. It felt like sinking into a luxurious cloud. However, we also had some comfort complaints. 

We tested this shoe by walking briskly for 2.5 miles on flat ground. After 1.5 miles, we noticed significant rubbing from the strap that caused a small blister by the end of the walk. This was not the slide’s intended use – and may not be an issue when casually walking around camp or running errands at home – but we wanted to share our experience. 

Some online reviews criticized this shoe’s fit to be too wide or too short and complained of rubbing from the strap. Our feet fit snugly but comfortably into the shoe and under the cross-foot strap. We never felt like our feet were being squeezed nor did we feel that our feet slid around. In direct comparison to the Crocs Classic Clogs –– which we found to be too wide and loose enough to fall off our feet –– this slide fit wonderfully. However, it’s not available in half-sizes. We recommend sizing up if you’re in between sizes. 

VERSATILITY

As its name suggests, the HOKA Ora Recovery 3 Slide’s intended use is recovery. We give it major points for excelling as a recovery shoe, but it isn’t the camp shoe to wear for a day hike. At the same time, its traction, cushion, and water resistance do provide some versatility. 

When testing the Ora, we wore it down a pretty steep side slope filled with small, loose rocks and leaves. The shoe held on really well, demonstrating some versatile traction. Thanks to the cushioning, our feet were serenely oblivious to the sharp and pointy rocks underfoot.  Although, the slide did slide around a bit – and even got sideways at points – when we walked on uneven surfaces. This fit limited versatility. 

We love that the shoe can get wet, muddy, and totally disgusting at camp and wash off easily. It can stand in water just fine, but we wouldn’t recommend walking through wide river crossings with this shoe. 

Finally, you can wear this slide with or without socks, giving you a greater comfort range during changing temperatures at night.   

SUPPORT

The Ora Recovery Slide has made a name for itself with its amazing support. HOKA specifically designed these to be recovery shoes that support the arches of our feet.

When testing, we directly compared the HOKA Ora to the Crocs Classic Clogs, wearing a Croc on our left foot and HOKA on our right. We walked around the office in circles after an especially challenging 5-mile hike that featured 1,200 feet of gain in the first mile alone. We noticed our Croc-adorned left foot made full contact with the ground with each step, but our right HOKA-ed foot made contact first with the heel, then the midfoot, and then the toes. This wave-like motion massaged the day’s pain from our feet and crying calves. Contrarily, we felt like we were stomping around in the Croc. 

When we took the HOKAs out for a bigger walk –– about 2.5 miles on a flat, paved trail –– we noticed that this aggressive midsole support bothered our feet about half a mile in. After we walked briskly for another half-mile or so, our feet adjusted to the pressure. The initial irritant was not significant enough to make us want to stop walking, but it signaled that these shoes are probably not the best to wear for an extended or demanding walk. As discussed in the Versatility section, this shoe is recommended for recovery and lifestyle purposes.

DURABILITY

Reviewers mentioned only rave reviews of the shoe’s excellent quality. After the miles we put in, we didn’t find anything that made us disagree. After our tests in the field –– including walking up and down a rocky slope and hopping around on rocks –– we didn’t find a single scratch on these shoes. They seem to hold their shape and structure well.

Should You Buy the HOKA ORA Recovery 3 Slide?

While this is not the shoe we’d recommend for long or intense adventures from camp, we would recommend the HOKA Ora slides for lighter duties. These shoes are not only a great option for casual camp needs and running errands around town. They also offer great support to help you recover from long days on the trail.

What Other Camp Shoes Should You Consider?

Find more of our favorite camp shoes below and on our full guide to the Best Camp Shoes. 

OOfos OOriginal Sandal Review: This recovery sandal is lighter than the HOKA and has a less “outdoorsy” look for wearing around town. The foam is just as cushioned and heavenly though. 

Xero Shoes Z-Trail EV Review: Though this shoe gives up cushion and support for lightness, it is a great option for backpackers looking for something to strap to their pack. 

KEEN Hyperport H2 Sandal Review: We found this shoe to be very supportive with good versatility. They outperform the HOKAs in their ability to hike and take adventures from camp.

Bottom Line

 The Feathered Friends Down Booties are a great idea to keep warm at camp. They insulated our feet and kept us warm on frozen ground and in our sleeping bags during an early January camping trip, but they lacked the versatility and reliable fit of other camp shoes we tested and reviewed. They also are not very durable, and we had some issues with the cinch coming out of the boots. We would, however, happily take these down booties along to backcountry hut trips and winter camping trips, no problem. 

These booties are one of the more specialized pairs of our favorite camp shoes. We found them to be warmer than other cold-weather options like the North Face ThermoBall Traction Mules V. Thoughtful details include a removable and waterproof shell, so you can wear the clean lining in your sleeping bag for a warmer night. The cinches keep cold, out and the footbed works well for mild forest detritus around camp. They provide great value for those looking to keep warm during trickier weather and peace of mind for those looking to extend their car camping season.

How We Tested

We tested these insulated booties in early January at a campground with freezing nighttime temperatures and frozen ground. While at camp, we tested them continuously over 16 hours. We walked over pine needles and small sticks, rough-housed with our dog, cooked, and even slept in these booties to evaluate their comfort, versatility, support, and durability.

COMFORT

The Feathered Friends Down Booties offer a confusing mix of comfort. On one hand, they felt like sleeping bags wrapped around our feet. Who doesn’t dream of sinking into their favorite sleeping bag after a long hike? On the other hand, the lack of structure hindered a correct fit and irritated our feet when we tested them at camp. 

These booties are easy to slip into and don’t require any break in period. We found no seams or tags that might lead to a blister (though we also wouldn’t recommend taking this for walks long enough to procure a blister). The plush 800 fill power European goose down felt like clouds caressing our unworthy stompers. 

At camp, we did normal camp things: flipped patties on the grill, rough-housed with inexhaustible dogs, and walked to the nearest bathroom (and walked away from it as quickly as possible). During these activities, we noticed that the sole – a thin slab of waterproof material – moved around so much that sometimes we stepped on the side of the boot, not the sole. Think of a high school girl wearing Ugg Boots circa 2010. 

To be clear, we tightened the cinches and buttoned down the lining to the correct size before testing these in the field. There were no gaps between pant leg and shoe, and the pressure of the ankle cinch was palpable. Regardless, the bootie’s soles would not stay put during basic camp chores, which negatively affected our comfort at camp.

VERSATILITY

The Feathered Friends Down Booties are more specialized camp shoes than many we tested and reviewed. They excel for their intended use – keeping feet toasty at camp in cold temperatures – but rate poorly for versatility. 

The sole is thin, thin, thin – even compared to the minimalist Xero Shoes. At camp, we found they provided adequate protection from pine needles, small sticks, and other campside detritus we walked on regularly. We were a bit worried about taking these through the campground to the bathroom, but they did just fine. However, we wouldn’t trust them for more demanding uses. This is not the camp shoe for summer backpacking trips, water crossings, or anything more than short wanders around camp. 

SUPPORT

Similarly, we do not recommend the Feather Friends Down Booties if you are looking for a supportive camp shoe. Classic camp shoes have a rigid sole and tough heel to provide stability and cradle the delicate curves of our tired, achy feet. In contrast, these insulated booties have zero real support with almost non-existent soles that offer more of a barefoot feeling in camp.

We tested these after a meandering 6-mile day after walking in unsupportive shoes that left our arches achy and tight. The down booties were not terrible to wear around camp, but we craved the support of the HOKA ORA Recovery 3 Slides.

DURABILITY

Compared with classic camp shoes, the Feathered Friends Down Booties’ durability is not a strong suit, either. Yes, they withstood a full 16 hours at camp – including time inside our sleeping bag – and came out with minimal impact. We were surprised at their sturdiness,  especially because at one point we had a rambunctious dog using our feet as a launchpad for her zoomies. 

However, these shoes are not meant to withstand conditions outside of the immediate camp area. Feathered Friends even states, “Our booties were built for warmth, not a marathon, so please use them responsibly.” We have to approach these shoes with the same caution that we would our beloved sleeping bags and puffy jackets. 

We also noticed that somewhere along the journey from camp to home, the cinch on the boot opening came out on both booties. We were able to re-string it through the boot but nearly lost the string while unpacking the car. 

Feathered Friends offers a lifetime warranty against issues with quality or production. They will not cover normal wear or improper use. Be careful with these insulated booties.

Should You Buy the Feathered Friends Down Booties?

The Feathered Friends Down Booties excel at their specific purpose – keeping feel warm and comfortable at cold-weather campsites. Their feather-light weight (thanks to the down) makes them the lightest, most packable camp shoes on our list of favorites. However, these aren’t the camp shoes to depend on for summertime temperatures or any sort of exploring beyond the campground. We only recommend them for cold weather camping adventures.

What Other Camp Shoes Should You Consider?

The Feathered Friends Down Booties are just one of the best camp shoes. Here are some other great options: 

The North Face ThermoBall Traction Mule Review: Thermoballs won’t be as reliable in cold temps – and are significantly heavier – but they’re more versatile insulated camp shoes than the Feathered Friends Down Booties. 

Crocs Classic Clog Review: These classical yet contentious clogs offer a lightweight shoe that travels well but can’t hold a candle to Feathered Friends in cold weather

Bedrock Mountain Clog Review: Other clogs can’t match the traction, hike-ability, and protective leather uppers of the Bedrock Mountain Clogs do. These are heavy but excel at car camping and 3-season adventuring.

Bottom Line

The Crocs Classic Clog has been a staple of our camp shoe guide for years. The simplicity of this camp shoe – paired with its versatility and light weight – make it a top choice for backcountry and front country campsites. However, we found issues with the fit and support, which hindered us in some outdoor activities. We couldn’t even depend on them to keep up as we fast-walked through a busy, post-holiday airport. 

Still, the downsides to this shoe are limited if you are seeking a shoe to chill at camp –– so long as you can get past its iconic style. It can be worn alone or with thick, winter socks. It provides support while standing that can feel wonderful after a long day of hiking. We didn’t find these to be super breathable, but they did dry faster than some of the water shoes included in our camp shoe roundup. Overall, we’ve found the Classic Clog a great value for activities like gardening, lounging around camp, and working as a chef. 

How We Tested

We wore this shoe through the Dallas Fort Worth airport on a busy day, crossed an ankle-deep stream, and timed how quickly our feet and clogs dried.

COMFORT

With a face like that, Crocs must offer great comfort… right? We found some issues with the fit that disappointed us. Overall, though, these shoes were easy to throw on and required no break-in time. 

There are two ways you can wear the croc: with the heel strap around the heel (“sport mode”) or over the top of the foot. With the heel strap deployed, our big toes smashed into the front of the shoe. Looking down, we saw our foot had been pushed up from the heel by a couple of centimeters. 

We moved the heel strap to the top of the foot. Our foot sunk back to the natural heel of the shoe. We were then able to appreciate the wide toe box and roomy feel. However, with any intentional walking – like when we sped through an airport to catch a flight – the shoes didn’t stay on our feet well. We managed to keep the shoe on, but our foot moved all around within the shoe. We believe this is why the insole is textured –– a feature that irritated our feet after being torn up by a long day of hiking in our boots.

VERSATILITY

On paper, the Classic Croc excels in versatility, but its fit knocks down its versatility rating. We wouldn’t feel comfortable traveling too far away from camp in these or depend on them to hike out of the backcountry if something happened to our hiking boots. 

That being said, this shoe is light at 0.7 pounds for the pair. It’s easy to see why backpackers have chosen Crocs for their backcountry camp shoes. 

This camp shoe also has great cushion and acts as an excellent barrier to the rough outdoor world. The traction was greater than we expected but nowhere near as great as some of our other favorite camp shoes. Again, if we’re judging this shoe solely for lounging at camp, the traction is perfectly adequate.  

We tested these in water and found that we like the holes around the side of the foot. They allowed water to escape the shoe. It took just under 10 minutes for our feet to feel dry after getting wet but a bit longer for that squeaky noise to disappear.

SUPPORT

The Croc is known for its support. Second to comfort and ease, it’s the reason why this shoe took off in popularity. We found it to provide good support when standing still – not the best when walking around. 

After walking around on some not-so-supportive shoes for a six-mile hike, we slipped into the classic Crocs. During the hike, it felt like our knees were swollen and sore, but we felt that pain alleviate after wearing the Crocs in camp. The insole felt like it was meeting our arches, and the foam let us sink into the shoe. The shoe also passed the bend, twist, and squeeze tests we put it through – holding up to us putting pressure all around the shoe.

But we would be remiss without explaining how this shoe acts on the move. Because of the Croc’s tight fit, we mostly walked around without the heel strap, sometimes contorting our feet to keep the shoe on.

DURABILITY

The shoe is made from Croslite compound, which is a type of EVA material. EVA blends the qualities of plastic and rubber. Crocs has trademarked their own EVA type, but we can generally expect this shoe to act like the Merrell Hydro Moc or other rubber-like camp shoes in our annual round up. 

We wanted to find the limits of this material, so we stretched and scratched into it. What we found is that the material is fairly elastic but won’t lose its shape. User reviews on the Crocs website claim that this shoe is either durable or very durable. Only 4% of the nearly 30,000 reviews expressed displeasure with the shoe’s durability.

Should You Buy the Crocs Classic Clog?

The Croc is a simple, lightweight shoe that can walk through water and across rough terrain. It makes for a good camp shoe, assuming that you don’t have to walk anywhere far or fast while wearing them. They are the most affordable option on our list of favorite camp shoes. However, those looking to stack some miles on their camp shoes should look elsewhere. The fit of the Crocs is one of the biggest reasons we say this. With the heel strap around the heel, the foot is squished to the top of the shoe. Without the heel strap, the shoe is so loosey, goosey that it fell off our gear analyst’s feet. Still, it’s a popular option with backpackers looking for something lightweight, packable, and comfortable in camp.

What Other Camp Shoes Should You Consider?

Browse the other options below or get the full run down in our Best Camp Shoe gear guide. 

Merrell Hydro Moc Review: The Hydro Moc is a great comparison to the Croc. Though it has a similar appearance and function, we found that it fit better, felt more supportive, and generally was more comfortable. 

KEEN Hyperport H2 Sandal Review: This water shoe rated as one of the highest on our favorite camp shoes list this year. It has ample support and cushion, great traction, and feels durable. 

HOKA ORA Recovery 3 Slide Review: The ORA is first and foremost a recovery shoe. Beyond the excellent support this shoe offers, we love that the simple, slide design looks good in and out of camp.

Bottom Line

Overall, we fell in love with the Bedrock Mountain Clog. Not only can this camp shoe go anywhere comfortably, but the company has a comprehensive shoe repair program and donates to 1% for the Planet. The most notable qualities of this shoe are comfort, versatility, and durability. Though not highly rated for support, they offer a stiff, zero-drop sole that some enjoy wearing after a long day of hiking to spread out their feet and move naturally. 

Pricier than other options in our camp shoes gear guide, these clogs are a life-long investment and incredible value. The Vibram Megagrip sole stands up to climbing over wet, slippery rocks and casual games of driveway basketball. Three straps help you adjust this shoe to your foot, and the wide toe box is comfortable out of the box. The materials are durable and long-lasting. On top of all those juicy details, Bedrock will replace the soles and make repairs to the clog and straps for “a reasonable cost.”

This warm-when-you-need-it-cool-when-you-don’t clog makes a great three-seasons camp shoe for hiking, camp, travel, and home.

How We Tested

We tested these clogs on a full day of air travel, 30 minutes of driveway basketball, and a two-mile walk over pavement, gravel, packed dirt, and grass.

COMFORT

When we first put on these clogs, they felt too short, and our big toe was pressed into the top of the shoe. However, we adjusted the two straps across the top of the foot and the heel strap. Once these were loose, the fit got more comfortable. Throughout a full day of airport travel and a two-mile walk, we no longer noticed our big toe smashing into the shoe or feeling suffocated. That being said, Bedrock Sandals recommends sizing up.

At airport security, taking these clogs off  and throwing them back on was very easy, even in a panic. The straps along the back naturally found their place at my heel. 

Throughout the airport test, we found this shoe very comfortable. We paired our Mountain Clogs with a pair of Darn Tough wool socks. We could wiggle our toes freely and enjoyed the generous width of the shoe, especially in the toe box. During the flight, the shoe still felt good even as our feet swelled. Another aspect we love is how flexible and soft the suede uppers are. 

We were initially skeptical of the break-in period since these camp shoes felt stiff and heavy. However, they didn’t need breaking in, and the leather suede upper will get softer over time. After 30 minutes of playing basketball in these clogs with wool socks, we didn’t notice any excessive rubbing or blisters forming. Throughout basketball, we felt comfortable, and our feet never slipped. We felt secure jumping, making quick stops, pivoting, and light jogging.

VERSATILITY

The intended use of this shoe is all-mountain, three-season use. Bedrock claims that someone wore these shoes to hike the 800-mile AZT. While we don’t recommend throwing out your trail runners or hiking boots just yet, this makes us hopeful that these will perform in the backcountry. 

One issue with this shoe is weight. The pair weighs 24 oz, or 1.5 pounds, and don’t pack as well as others do for backpacking trips. However, your pack, your weight. Because these things can hike well, we personally might sneak these along on some weekend trips. 

Another drawback is these camp shoes are not waterproof. During our testing, the suede upper resisted water dropping on top of it. Water would immediately bead and fall off the material. However, this did not hold up to being submerged in water. 

After drying, we also noticed that the suede was a darker color than the non-submerged shoe. If that bothers you we might recommend getting a different upper option or spraying these with a durable water repellent like Nikwax Nubuck & Suede Waterproofing Spray. 

But we do love the Vibram sole. When testing, we took these down a steep, rocky slope to get to the river. The soles held on well. They also felt perfectly cushioned on our mini river adventure, protecting our feet from rocks and sticks.

SUPPORT

The Bedrock shoes have a stiff sole with zero drop from heel to toe. This type of insole might not work for everyone as it provides less heel cushioning and midfoot structure than traditional outdoor footwear. However, the shoe did resist when both twisted and squeezed it at the heel. 

The first test we conducted is bending, twisting, and squeezing. By placing the toe on the floor, keeping the shoe vertical, and pressing down on the heel, we noticed that the sole started to round. This indicates to us that the sole isn’t as supportive as some of our other favorite camp shoes (like the KEEN Hyperport H2 Sandal) –– though they were not as easily manipulated as the barefoot-style Xero Shoes Z-Trail EV. However, zero drop might not be an acceptable structure for those who have arch issues, existing foot pain, or no experience wearing zero-drop soles.

DURABILITY

The upper of this shoe is crafted from suede. Though suede is less durable than full-grain leather, it is a more durable material than most synthetic fabrics. Suede also requires some maintenance and care to maintain its appearance, such as waterproofing, conditioning, and cleaning by hand. 

If anything were to happen to the soles, Bedrock Sandals has a Re-Soul & Repair program. For $85, you can have the soles replaced as long as you haven’t worn into the foam. The warranty also offers strap and clog repairs for “a reasonable cost.”  

During and after our testing, we did not notice any significant issues with durability. There are no reviews from customers that note any issues with long-term durability of this shoe, either.

Should You Buy the Bedrock Mountain Clog?

The Bedrock Mountain Clog is an excellent choice for a camp shoe. Though other camp shoes we tested out-rank it in support and ability to travel through water, this clog is perfect for camping, hiking, traveling, and running around town. A tough sole with a Vibram Megagrip outsole feels comfortable and stable on a variety of terrain. This makes it a great alternative to hiking shoes or a backup when backpacking. The adjustable straps and wide toe box make this a top choice for comfort. However, this is not an ultra-light shoe nor a camp shoe for water crossings or joint support. As with most gear decisions, your best choice depends on your specific end use(s).

What Other Camp Shoes Should You Consider?

Find more camp shoe recommendations below and on our Best Camp Shoes gear guide.  

Xero Shoes Z-Trail EV Review: This is the ultra-lightweight shoe that makes for a good backpacking partner for longer trips. It has traction, a foamy sole, and a barefoot design. 

HOKA ORA Recovery 3 Slide Review: This is a great option for recovery and support. Our feet melt into the foamy sole, and we love the amazing cushion for tough campsites. 

Crocs Classic Clog Review: A clog by another name might not look as sweet, but it can offer what the Bedrock Mountain Clog cannot. The Croc is the best, ugliest shoe for everything from backpacking adventures to your grandmother’s garden.

Bottom Line

The OOfos OOriginal Sandal was built for recovery after strenuous activities and absolutely fits that bill. It’s great for those who need comfort and support back at camp after a 15-mile, joint-pounding hike. It also helps you get enough spring back into your step to grill dinner and set up camp. The only drawback is that Ooofos are not made for adventures or, really, anything more than walking around camp. For more strenuous outdoor uses, you’ll want to choose another option from our list of the best camp shoes.

Through our testing, we found these recovery sandals actually did improve our joint pain after long days. They fit well and have great cushion. These are very similar to the HOKA ORA Recovery 3 Slides. The HOKAs were more supportive, and the Oofos were more cloud-like. 

Overall, these OOfos recovery slides are a great value, especially considering their price. They work well at camp but are also great for leaving the gym and running errands around town.

How We Tested

We tested this product by walking approximately 2 miles and evaluated its unique recovery properties by wearing it after a 12-mile hike on strenuous terrain. In the office, we inspected these shoes closer to evaluate their support and durability.

COMFORT

The OOfos rate highly for comfort. Part of this comes from the cushy sole, but it has a great fit, is easy to wear, and doesn’t require breaking in. 

We wore our true size in this shoe and found it to fit like a dream. The straps were snug enough to keep the shoe from flying off our feet but weren’t so snug that they caused rubbing or discomfort. 

The Oofos OOriginal Sandal is one of our favorite camp shoes to throw on in a pinch. These are absolutely a shoe we can rely on to run from the tent to the bathroom in the middle of the night.

VERSATILITY

The OOfos OOriginal Sandal is a post-workout recovery shoe that’s recommended for casual walking only. For this casual use, they perform very well. They are lightweight (9.8 oz), non-slip, and waterproof.

For a lightweight flip-flop, though, they do not pack down well. They took up just as much space as the KEEN Hyperport H2 Sandals. 

The other drawback is that this shoe doesn’t work well for longer adventures. It’s great for setting up camp, making dinner, and running to the bathroom but not the best choice for longer walks or adventures outside of the campground. 

That being said, they demonstrated some versatility for wet conditions. When testing these sandals, we walked through a flooded parking lot during a flash flood and soaked our feet and shoes. Not only did our feet stay snug in the wet sandal, but the shoes and our feet dried very quickly –– within 10 minutes. We were also surprised at how well the shoe held traction on the buffed floor of a sports store when wet, too.

SUPPORT

Support is where the OOfos shines. This company is built on the premise of offering shoes for post-workout recovery. The company claims that their shoes can “reduce stress on sore feet, knees, and back, enable a more natural walking motion, and reduce energy requirements at primary joints for walking.” 

Our Gear Analyst rated this sandal 5 out of 5 for support. It is a recovery shoe made with OOfos OOfoam™ technology that absorbs 37% more impact than traditional footwear, and the midsole support helps distribute the impact of your footfall. This foam is supposed to reduce impact and aches on joints, making this an excellent choice for those who are putting in challenging hikes, trail runs, and bike rides before coming back to camp.

The shoe passed our bend, twist, squeeze test with ease, as well. Though the foam is soft, the sole is tough.

DURABILITY

The material of the OOfos OOriginal Sandal is proprietary, something they call OOfoam. It feels like a durable plastic and is machine washable. During our tests, we found the shoe to hold up the miles we put in with ease. 

OOfos recommends keeping shoes away from direct heat when drying, such as “hairdryers, heaters, and direct sunlight. As a camp shoe, you must be cautious around campfires and leaving these shoes in hot cars in direct sunlight. This is disappointing as sitting too close to fire or having gear sit in a hot car is all too common. 

OOfos provides a 6 month warranty on shoes purchased through OOfos or an authorized dealer. They will replace the shoes with a new pair if, within 6 months and if purchased from an authorized dealer, the toe post or strap broke, if there is any peeling, or if there is premature wear within 3 months of purchase.

Should You Buy the Oofos Ooriginal Sandal?

If you are looking for a sandal to recover at camp, this is a great choice. Just remember the OOfos OOriginal Sandal is not proper footwear for intense activities like hiking or water travel. This also might be a great option if you have existing joint issues. Please understand that this is not an official orthopedic recommendation: you should consult with your doctors for advice. We did find that after a long shift on hard-packed floors and after intense trail runs, this shoe gave us pep in our step and made our body feel amazing.

What Other Camp Shoes Should You Consider?

The OOfos are just one of many excellent options in our comprehensive camp shoes guide.

HOKA ORA Recovery 3 Slide Review: A match for comfort and support, the HOKA beat out the OOfos in that they simply have the comfort and versatility of being a slide that you can wear with or without socks. 

Bedrock Mountain Clog Review: This is kind of the opposite because instead of absolute arch support with tons of cushion, this is a zero drop shoe that allows your body to mimic natural feeling. 

KEEN Hyperport H2 Sandal Review: This has great support and feels like it puts the arch of the foot on a pedestal but this one can go farther and do more. The KEEN can relax at camp but it can also hike, travel through water, etc.

Bottom Line

Overall, the Mountain Hardwear Crater Lake Long Sleeve Hoody (men’s / women’s) is an amazing sun shirt. The knit material feels luxuriously soft while still delivering good breathability and wicking powers. The drawbacks are slight and nit-picky: the fabric clings to the upper arms; the drawstring at the hem feels awkward; the hood doesn’t fit well without a hat under; and the seams at the thumbholes began to wear after just a couple of uses. 

This sun shirt’s combination of benefits awarded it the Best Pick for Summer Comfort in our guide to the best sun shirts. When you’re already limited on luxuries while on the trail, the comfy factor on this hoodie goes a long way. The UPF 50 rating, hood, and thumb holes are also a gift to your future self, keeping you covered and protected from the sun while you adventure. 

This top is great for day hikers wishing to go for longer adventures. It dries quicker than other knits, weighs less, feels good as a layer under fleeces, and breathes well but doesn’t feel too technical.

How We Tested

We tested this sun hoody on day hikes in mild temperatures. We also loaded up our overnight pack to see how this top works on backpacking trips. We strolled, walked, jogged, and lounged in this top to gauge its breathability, comfort, wicking, versatility, and dry time. 

Comfort

The Crater Lake’s fabric is divine –– delivering a silky soft, almost brushed feeling against the skin. Common sense would say that a fabric this soft would be thicker and warmer, but this top is the lightest weight knit in the 2024 sun shirt review and even fourth lightest overall. 

The shirt fits well and the fabric stretches when needed, which was to be expected from the knits in this category. The fit does feel a little more snug compared to others in the Best Sun Shirts for 2024 review so you might want to size up if you’re between sizes.. It’s relaxed and drapey in the body, but does hug the arms.  

Overall, this shirt is a luxurious experience worthy of notoriety for its sheer lightness, soft touch, and excellent breathability.

Sun Protection

This shirt provides excellent sun protection. It has a UPF 50 rating, thumbholes, and a hood. 

The thumb holes are very comfortable, even when the arms are outstretched. They provided full coverage of the hand, hiding all the way up to the knuckle to keep the entire back of the hand protected. The fabric is so stretchy that pulling the sleeve around your hand would be easy without using the thumbholes. Be cautious of stretching this shirt too much, as UPF rating decreases when fabric is stretched.  

The hood initially felt like it fit great, but as we were hiking uphill, the damn thing kept falling back off our heads. The ironic part is that it was a rare still day in Reno –– not many days that we don’t have wind here! We were getting pretty frustrated with the hood falling off on this windless day, so we couldn’t imagine how useless the hood would be in more challenging weather. It did fit better with a hat on under.

Breathability & Wicking Power

When testing, we hiked a loaded overnight pack up the Sierra Front Trail in Reno, Nevada on a sunny, 50-plus-degree day. After the major climbs, as we panted for breath, a little sweat saturatedthe shirt, yet we didn’t feel stuffy or like sweat was pooling up on our skin. 

After taking our packs off for the initial climb, we were surprised to see how much sweat the shirt picked up around the hip belt, on the back, and under the arms. There was a good amount of sweat, but I didn’t feel any of that while hiking. As we hiked more, we realized that the fabric clings a bit more when sweaty and feels cold. 

Unfortunately, this does not dry as quickly as some of the other top-rated sun shirts, but it falls somewhere in the middle of the pack.

Versatility

The versatility of this shirt is funky and very subjective. Our gear analysts didn’t particularly find the zippered pocket at the side that useful. It is large enough to fit keys or two small bars, but not both. While running in this shirt with keys in the pocket, the drape of the fabric that we loved so much before made the keys bang around. We found it annoying, but others might not. 

Most notably, the tie at the hem on the women’s version is a bit awkward. I’m not going to lie—this seems like one of those “feminine” design elements that is totally obsolete. We didn’t find that it helped adjust the fit or comfort of the top (those categories are already 10s in our eyes!). Instead, we found it to be a bit awkward, drooping down in our crotches and flopping around as we walked. Again, that might not bother everyone. 

We also found that we had to keep switching from fleece to no fleece over after this shirt became sweaty. It was too cold on the 50-degree day to just wear a thin, wet fabric, but this became too hot under a fleece. 

Finally, there might be some quality issues. Straight out of the washer, some threads were coming loose, and some threads sounded like they were ripping when we were changing in and out of it. The opening for the thumbholes isn’t stitched down to the sleeve, so the stitching is exposed and at risk of snagging.

Should You Buy the Mountain Hardwear Crater Lake Hoody?

The Mountain Hardwear Crater Lake is a great option for those who want something a bit more technical than their average knit but still has that classic stretch, softness, and outstanding sun protection that knits excel at. It works well for casual hikes andthe zippered pocket is the perfect place to stash keys if you don’t want to take a pack. 

This would also be a good option for longer adventures as it will dry faster than other knits. This feels like a good choice for someone hiking 5-10 miles who wants something technical,  comfortable, and within budget. 

This might not be the best choice for someone who is looking for an ultra- quick drying layer to take on adventures like backcountry skiing, where lots of sweat and cold temperatures should be expected.

What Other Sun Shirts Should You Consider?

Before you make up your mind, be sure to check out our guide to the best sun shirts. Here are some options that are similar to the Crater Lake Hoody:

Milk & Whiskey Chaser Review: Another great option for casual day hikes is the Milk & Whiskey Chaser sun hoodie. It has a comfortable fit, really soft fabric, zippered pocket, and sun protective features. It is slightly pricier than the Mountain Hardwear, but feels like better quality materials and more versatility for cooler weather. 

Minus 33 Micro Weight 1/4 Zip Sun Hoodie Woolverino Review: Soft, lightweight, and a great mix of breathable and wicking. This one isn’t quite as soft as the Mountain Hardwear but its wool base promises to get softer over time. It has sun protective features, but only has a UPF rating of 20 which places it below the Skin Cancer Foundations recommendation for protection. However, this top is just as light, with more versatility and greater overall comfort. 

Arc’teryx Taema / Cormac Hoody Review: Though more technical than the Crater Lake, the Arc’teryx is a great choice for layering in cool weather. It is lightweight, breathable, and excellent at wicking. It resists odors and dries quickly.  This option is more expensive and not as comfortable as the Mountain Hardwear, but may be a better bang for buck for its long-lasting quality and year-round application.